Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Mullen

Citations

  • 72 Mass. App. Ct. 136
  • 889 N.E.2d 52
  • 2008 Mass. App. LEXIS 662

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting Mass. R. A. P. 4 [b], as amended, 378 Mass. 928 [1979], and concluding that date of entry is date judgment or order is actually entered on docket
  • denial of motion for new trial reversed where motion judge did not conduct adequate colloquy before allowing defendant to proceed pro se
  • “The judge’s signing of the required certification, while not conclusive, provides some evidence that the defendant’s waiver is knowing and intelligent”
  • time in which to notice appeal \runs not from ... the time the parties receive notice\ of judgment or order but \from the date of entry\ [quotation omitted]
  • “Judicial compliance with rule 3:10 is mandatory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rubin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.