Commonwealth v. Muhammed

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding officers had reasonable suspicion that violation of Motor Vehicle Code occurred or was occurring when they stopped appellant; therefore, stop of vehicle was proper
• vacating a conviction under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 4119 (trademark counterfeiting), because the statute was declared unconstitutional after the date of conviction
• reversing conviction for trademark counterfeiting because Pennsylvania Supreme Court declared trademark counterfeiting statute unconstitutional
• reversing conviction for trademark counterfeiting because Pennsylvania Supreme Court declared trademark counterfeiting statute unconstitutional
• reasonable suspicion to stop defendant’s car where officer observed defendant’s center brake light fail to illuminate upon application of brakes
• “If no statutory authorization exists for a particular sentence, that sentence is illegal[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).