Commonwealth v. Muhammad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that a defendant can challenge the voluntariness of his guilty plea in a post-sentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea
• stating that appellant voluntarily entered a guilty plea where he read the guilty plea colloquy and understood the basic tenets of the guilty plea
• explaining that defendants are bound by statements that they make during guilty plea colloquies and may not later assert claims which contradict those statements
• stating that appellant cannot claim that he involuntarily entered a guilty plea where he stated that no one threatened him to plead guilty
• stating that appellant cannot claim that he involuntarily entered a guilty plea where he stated that no one threatened him to plead guilty
• explaining that challenge to imposition of consecutive sentences involves discretionary aspects of sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).