Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/1/2003
Commonwealth v. Mouzon
Citations
- 828 A.2d 1126
- 2003 Pa. Super. 249
- 2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1870
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[i]n setting sentence, a court has discretion … to run the sentence concurrently with or consecutively to other sentences being imposed.”
- affirming deviation from guidelines where trial court fashioned sentence primarily based on “how [the] record bore on Mouzon’s prospects for rehabilitation, coupled with the court’s sense of duty to protect the public”
- concern against running sentences concurrently by way of habit allowing criminals to recewe \volume discounts\ for their separate criminal acts
- “this Court has expressed concern against running sentences concurrently by way of habit, lest criminals receive ‘volume discounts’ for their separate criminal acts”
- An “appellate court must give great weight to the sentencing court's discretion, as he or she is in the best position to measure factors such as the nature of the crime, the defendant's character, and the defendant's display of remorse, defiance, or indifference”
- An “appellate court must give great weight to the sentencing court's discretion, as he or she is in the best position to measure factors such as the nature of the crime, the defendant's character, and the defendant's display of remorse, defiance, or indifference”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stevens, Lally-Green, Beck
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. TiradoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-03-03· cited 476×
- Commonwealth v. ColonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-10-24· cited 398×
- Commonwealth v. PerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-08-10· cited 141×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-12-07· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-04-10· cited 45×
- Balsavage v. WetzelE.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-03-20· cited 2×
- Com. v. Miller, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-06-11
- Commonwealth v. LazarLancaster County Court of Common Pleas· 2007-11-05
- Commonwealth v. LawheadLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-04-21
- Commonwealth v. HartLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-10-27
- Commonwealth v. KrauseLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-10-27
- Commonwealth v. KiblerLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2011-03-01
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsBucks County Court of Common Pleas· 2011-07-06
- Commonwealth v. SponheimerCarbon County Court of Common Pleas· 2012-07-24
- Commonwealth v. BriceDelaware County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-09-21
- Commonwealth v. WellsAdams County Court of Common Pleas· 2008-04-01
- Com. v. Pratt, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-04-17
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. MouzonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-19· cited 702×
- Commonwealth v. RoddaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-01-07· cited 199×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-03-29· cited 170×
- Commonwealth v. CunninghamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-07-31· cited 169×
- Commonwealth v. EllisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-07-30· cited 146×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-10-16· cited 60×
- Commonwealth v. BurkholderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-10-07· cited 40×
- Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-08-25· cited 40×
- Commonwealth v. GaddisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-22· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. KocherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-02-13· cited 34×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.