Commonwealth v. Mosley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “notice and [an] opportunity to be heard are integral to forfeiture proceedings”
• stating that “notice and opportunity to be heard are integral to forfeiture proceedings”
• “[A] proceeding for return of property is distinct from a forfeiture proceeding, and, although the two types of actions may commonly be heard together, to file one type of action does not in itself serve to initiate [or resolve] the other.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).