Commonwealth v. Moser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• this Court lacks jurisdiction to address additional claims from an appellee where they did not file a cross-appeal
• this Court lacks jurisdiction to address additional claims from an appellee where they did not file a cross-appeal
• “The trial court’s quash of the information was improper because its rationale for doing so was more a judgment of the Commonwealth’s evidence than a determination of the validity of the information.”
• \The trial court's quash of the information was improper because its rationale for doing so was more a judgment of the Commonwealth's evidence than a determination of the validity of the information. \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. McKeirnan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-04· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Shaffer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-05-03· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Stein
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-05-26· cited 5×
• Com. v. Miller, M.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-01-17
• Commonwealth v. Hale
  Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas· 1985-02-04
• Com. v. Aguilar, S.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-06-10

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Niemetz
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-11-26· cited 109×
• Commonwealth v. Meoli
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-15· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Barnes
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-15· cited 7×