Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 4/29/2003
Commonwealth v. Moran
Citations
- 823 A.2d 923
- 2003 Pa. Super. 166
- 2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 880
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling that an amended sentencing order filed during pendency of the appeal clarifying an ambiguity was valid and rendered moot the appellant’s claim that the order was ambiguous
- “Once a notice of appeal has been filed, the trial court generally lacks jurisdiction to modify its sentence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Klein and Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-29· cited 725×
- Commonwealth v. MartzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-06-06· cited 97×
- Commonwealth v. PoncalaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-12-08· cited 41×
- Commonwealth v. ShimonvichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-09-01· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. OteroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-10-08· cited 17×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-10-28· cited 1,456×
- Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-19· cited 208×
- Commonwealth v. KleinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-10-04· cited 71×
- Jackson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-07-18· cited 39×
- Manack v. SandlinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-10-25· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. CostlowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-04-12· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. HaughwoutSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-01-21· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.