Commonwealth v. Morales-Gasparini, J.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that determination of whether requested information contains trade secrets usually requires an in camera review
• determining whether a trade secret exists usually requires the court to perform either an in camera review of the information or an evidentiary hearing
• determining whether a trade secret exists usually requires the court to perform either an in camera review of the information or an evidentiary hearing
• granting certiorari petition and quashing the order compelling disclosure of alleged trade secrets where the trial court \ordered disclosure without an in camera review\
• “Orders improperly requiring the disclosure of trade secrets or other proprietary information often, create irreparable harm and are thus appropriate for certiorari review.” (quoting Grooms v. Distinctive Cabinet Designs, Inc., 846 So.2d 652, 654 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003))
• \Orders improperly requiring the disclosure of trade secrets or other proprietary information often create irreparable harm and are thus appropriate for certiorari review.\ (quoting Grooms v. Distinctive Cabinet Designs, Inc., 846 So. 2d 652, 654 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).