Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 12/11/1989
Commonwealth v. Moore
Citations
- 567 A.2d 701
- 389 Pa. Super. 473
- 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4083
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to find issues waived “where the trial court had considered an amended post-trial motion on the merits of the issue without granting permission for the defendant to file nunc pro tunc[]”
- where the trial court considered an amended post-trial motion on the merits of the issue without granting permission for the defendant to file nunc pro tunc, the issue was not waived
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanaugh, Brosky and Rowley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. ImpellizzeriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-12· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. SchwartzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-10-20· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. GaddisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-22· cited 37×
- Valentine v. WrotenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-17· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. McMasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-10-20· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. MorganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-05-19· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. IannelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-10-18· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. SperrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-02· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. BybelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-11-05· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. FoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-05-29· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.