Commonwealth v. Monroe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that in light of changes to Rule 1410, Appellant’s failure to include issue in his 1925(b) statement did not render issue automatically waived because under facts of case, such a failure did not preclude effective review of claim
• finding that in light of changes to Rule 1410, Appellant's failure to include issue in his 1925(b) statement did not render issue automatically waived because under facts of case, such a failure did not preclude effective review of claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Lord
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-10-28· cited 1,456×
• Commonwealth v. Shamberger
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-07· cited 280×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Warner
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1990-12-10· cited 68×
• Commonwealth v. Parker
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-09-29· cited 22×
• State v. Harrison
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-04-29· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-12-11· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Cortes
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-05-23· cited 14×