Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Monarch

Citations

  • 200 A.3d 51

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that a claim that “enhanced mandatory minimum sentences authorized by the [J-31-2022] - 11 statute are unconstitutional when based on a refusal to submit to a warrantless blood test” constitutes a challenge to the legality of the sentence
  • \Birchfield contemplated that the decision would apply not only to separate criminal offenses but also to enhanced sentencing . . . that might arise from refusal.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baer, Donohue, Dougherty, Mundy, Saylor, Todd, Wecht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.