Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 554 A.2d 542
  • 381 Pa. Super. 592
  • 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming conviction for REAP when the defendant’s struggle over a police officer’s firearm, could have caused the firearm to discharge
  • affirming REAP conviction for attempting to remove an officer’s weapon, unsnapping his holster in the process
  • REAP proven where, during struggle, defendant unsnapped officer’s holster so that gun could easily be removed; Court found “[t]here was the very strong possibility that the revolver could discharge, injuring [the officer]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olszewski, Kelly, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.