Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 570 A.2d 532
  • 391 Pa. Super. 100
  • 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 322

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that, “[i]n homicide cases, pathologists may base their opinions on facts from autopsy reports prepared by others”
  • in homicide cases, testifying pathologists may base their opinions on facts contained in autopsy reports authored by others
  • Judge Olszewski’s opinion, in which Judges Cavanaugh and Cercone concurred, stated that because the trial court only admitted the facts from the autopsy report but not medical opinion, McCloud could be distinguished.
  • cited with approval in Commonwealth v. Fletcher, 896 A.2d 508, 510 (Pa. 2006)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Olszewski, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.