Commonwealth v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that credit is not given for a commitment by reason of a separate and distinct offense
• stating that “‘credit for 5 any days spent in custody prior to the imposition of sentence’” shall be given “‘but only if such commitment is on the offense for which sentence is imposed,’” and that “‘[c]redit is not given . . . for a commitment by reason of a separate and distinct offense’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Infante
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-03-06· cited 262×
• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-03-23· cited 62×
• Commonwealth v. Clark
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-10-21· cited 47×
• Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Tout-Puissant
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-04-25· cited 11×
• Com. v. Saunders, D.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-01-10· cited 10×
• Kelly v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-06-06· cited 2×
• D. Foxe v. PA DOC
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-07-09