Skip to main content
· 5/28/1982

Commonwealth v. Milano

Citations

  • 446 A.2d 325
  • 300 Pa. Super. 251
  • 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because implied repeals are not favored in the law, the legislative intent to impliedly repeal a statute by enacting another must be clearly shown.”
  • “Because implied repeals are not favored in the law, the legislative intent to impliedly repeal a statute by enacting another must be clearly shown.”
  • “Because implied repeals are not favored in the law, the legislative intent to impliedly repeal a statute by enacting another must be clearly shown.”
  • “Because implied repeals are not favored in the law, the legislative intent to impliedly repeal a statute by enacting another must be clearly shown.”
  • “Because implied repeals are not favored in the law, the legislative intent to impliedly repeal a statute by enacting another must be clearly shown.”
  • where plaintiff waited 22 days after answer was due to file praecipe

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beck, Watkins, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.