Commonwealth v. Middleton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where expert witness’ opinion is not merely based upon personal views, or those of a small segment of the scientific community, testimony is not deficient merely because numerous experts were not called to testify
• electrophoretic analysis of dried blood
• electrophoretic analysis of dried blood

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Zook
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-17· cited 102×
• Commonwealth v. Rodgers
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-02-26· cited 98×
• Commonwealth v. Montalvo
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-05-12· cited 85×
• Blum Ex Rel. Blum v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-12-29· cited 54×
• Commonwealth v. Apollo
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-09· cited 33×
• People v. Gistover
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-05-06· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Stringer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-06-04· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. McCauley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-03-28· cited 18×
• McKenzie v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-15· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. Nocero
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-11-16· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Scher
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-07· cited 10×
• In Re: Order Approving the Amendment of Pa Rules of Evidence 901(a), 902(4), 902(6) & 902(12)
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-11-04
• In Re: Order Approving the Amendment of Pa Rule of Evidence 901
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-05-20
• Williams v. Milliken
  Armstrong County Court of Common Pleas· 1989-06-09
• Checchio v. Frankford Hospital
  Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1998-01-08