Commonwealth v. Meyerle, W.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that constitutional nature of claims is of \no consequence\ under anti-injunction provision of Tax Code
• holding that constitutional nature of claims is of “no consequence” under anti-injunction provision of Tax Code
• holding that “the constitutional nature of a taxpayer’s claim, as distinct from its probability of success, is of no consequence under the Anti-Injunction Act”
• holding that “the constitutional nature of a taxpayer’s claim, as distinct from its probability of success, is of no consequence under the Anti-Injunction Act”
• noting that the constitutional nature of a taxpayer’s claim “is of no consequence under the Anti-Injunction Act”
• “[Ajllowing injunctive relief on the basis of this showing [of irreparable injury] alone would render [the Anti-Injunction Act] quite meaningless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).