Skip to main content
· 3/2/1989

Commonwealth v. Merriwether

Citations

  • 555 A.2d 906
  • 382 Pa. Super. 411
  • 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the availability of legal alternatives, including the ability to contact the police, defeats a justification defense
  • holding that because the defendant had the legal alternative of contacting the authorities that he could not invoke the defense of necessity
  • stating that individual is considered “present” during the execution of a warrant when he knocks on the door while police are conducting a search of the residence
  • holding threats of violence received by the defendant over the telephone “do not constitute [a threat of] clear and imminent harm” because “he could have notified the authorities and informed them of these threats”
  • court considered oral motion to dismiss made on the record prior to a bench trial
  • Police could conduct a protective pat-down search of defendant, whom they had probable cause to arrest for a narcotics violation, and weapon seized as a result of that search was admissible in prosecution for violation of Uniform Firearms Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olszewski, Del Sole and Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.