Skip to main content
· 3/31/1983

Commonwealth v. Menginie

Citations

  • 458 A.2d 966
  • 312 Pa. Super. 293
  • 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2812

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding waiver of a claim that a search warrant was invalid because it contained misstatements of fact supporting probable cause, where Menginie failed to apprise the suppression court of the specific factual errors contained in the warrant
  • finding waiver of a claim that a search warrant was invalid because it contained misstatements of fact supporting probable cause, where Menginie failed to apprise the suppression court of the specific factual errors contained in the warrant
  • finding waiver of a claim that a search warrant was invalid due to alleged misstatements of fact supporting probable cause where the appellant failed to apprise the suppression court of the specific factual errors contained in the warrant
  • to preserve an issue regarding the admissibility of evidence, an appellant must file a motion in limine or a suppression motion and argue the specific grounds sought for suppression
  • Warrant authorizing search of “214 North Linden and its garage” upheld

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wickersham, Brosky, Wieand

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.