Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Melvin

Citations

  • 172 A.3d 14

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that.atrial court is permitted to impose a sentence composed ofa term of year$ 8$.. the minimum sentence and life-imprisonment as the maximum sentence pursuant to· the Supreme . . .. Court's Batts.' decisions
  • holding that sentencing court has no discretion to impose anything but a maximum life sentence on juvenile previously convicted of a homicide offense requiring sentence of life imprisonment with no parole and that such sentence is not unconstitutional
  • noting that a challenge to the trial court’s failure to provide funds for an expert is not a challenge to the discretionary aspects of a sentence
  • affirming Melvin’s judgment of sentence in a pre-Miller case where the “PCRA court found persuasive the ‘logic’ of subsection 1102.1(c)(1) and imposed a thirty-year-to-life sentence” compliant with Batts II
  • we affirmed the appellant’s resentence of 30 years to life imprisonment after his sentence of LWOP for second-degree murder was vacated
  • When reviewing the legality of a sentence, our standard of review is de novo and scope of review is plenary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stabile, Elliott, Strassburger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.