Commonwealth v. Medina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affidavit establishing only that defendant drove from his apartment to drug sale and thereafter returned directly to his apartment \lacks the requisite nexus\
• no probable cause to search apartment where no facts connected drug sales to residence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Escalera
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2012-06-29· cited 45×
• Commonwealth v. Lima
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-08-16· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Escalera
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-04-14· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. Forbes
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2014-04-08· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. Bookman
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2010-09-01· cited 1×
• Commonwealth v. Mello
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-05-23
• Commonwealth v. Hernandez
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2014-06-02
• Commonwealth v. One Hundred Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($100,100) and Christopher Parsons
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2022-05-16
• Commonwealth v. Daquan Dooley / Commonwealth v. Tiffany Scott
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2023-12-22

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-02-07· cited 29×