Commonwealth v. Mead

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s ownership of property could be inferred from deed containing his name and fact that defendant procured and paid for shingling of dwelling on property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Grandison v. Robertson
  Second Circuit· 1916-02-15· cited 27×
• Minns's Case
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1934-05-26· cited 26×
• Commonwealth v. Murphy
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1970-01-20· cited 13×
• City of Boston v. Smith & Wesson Corp.
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2000-07-13· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Cartwright
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-11-08· cited 4×
• Murphy v. Apsley
  Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 1938-05-13

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Hathaway v. Tinkham
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1888-11-28· cited 23×