Commonwealth v. McWilliams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that standard range sentences were not excessive even though they ran consecutively for an aggregate sentence of forty-one to eighty-two years of imprisonment
• holding that standard- range sentences were not excessive even though they ran consecutively
• holding that standard-range sentences were not excessive even though they ran consecutively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Commonwealth v. Fowler
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-02-15· cited 220×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-10· cited 739×
• Commonwealth v. Walls
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-03-23· cited 69×
• Commonwealth v. Rickabaugh
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-12-18· cited 66×
• Commonwealth v. Dodge
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-30· cited 43×
• Commonwealth v. Gaddis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-22· cited 37×
• Commonwealth v. Curnutte
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-03-22· cited 36×
• Graziani v. Randolph
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-03-16· cited 25×
• Com. v. Dodge
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-08-16· cited 18×