Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 10/3/1995
Commonwealth v. McNeil
Citations
- 665 A.2d 1247
- 445 Pa. Super. 526
- 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3019
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the PCRA “permits inquiry into whether a specific tribunal lacked jurisdiction to conduct a particular proceeding”
- explaining that issues are not cognizable under the remedy of habeas corpus if they could have been considered and corrected in the regular course of appellate review
- indicating challenge to probation revocation by means of PCRA petition is available for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, lack of jurisdiction, or illegal sentence
- explaining issues are not cognizable under remedy of habeas corpus if they could have been considered and corrected in regular course of appellate review
- explaining issues are not cognizable under remedy of habeas corpus if they could have been considered and corrected in regular course of appellate review
- rejecting argument that - 15 - J-S29037-21 “subject matter jurisdiction or jurisdiction over the person of a defendant who has been convicted of a crime can be voided because of delay in the application of a procedural rule.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tamilia, Popovich, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gary Lee Doctor v. Gilbert A. WaltersThird Circuit· 1996-11-04· cited 185×
- Joseph v. GluntSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-05-23· cited 110×
- Washington v. SobinaThird Circuit· 2007-01-11· cited 35×
- Flynn v. Casa Di Bertacchi Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-09· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. LantzySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-04-13· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. BallardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-01-06· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. DiVenturaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-05-25· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. BetheaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-09-08· cited 7×
- Williams v. SturmE.D. Pennsylvania· 2000-08-17· cited 3×
- Com. v. Baker, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-02-10
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 1,151×
- Commonwealth v. LittleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-01-24· cited 146×
- Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-04-08· cited 145×
- Commonwealth v. GoldblumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-07-02· cited 103×
- South Puerto Rico Sugar Co. Trading Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1965-01-18· cited 103×
- Commonwealth. v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-02-27· cited 59×
- Delaware River Port Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-06-28· cited 59×
- Strank v. Mercy Hospital of JohnstownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-01-04· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. MarchesanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-08-10· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. BRUNOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-06-11· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. WolfeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-04-15· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. GuessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-05-25· cited 32×
- Gvara v. KettleSupreme Court· 1958-10-20· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. GrierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-11-20· cited 23×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kennedy v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-06-30· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. ConfortiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-05-27· cited 12×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Wilson v. Keeper of the Jail of Philadelphia CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1856-07-01· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.