Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. McNeil

Citations

  • 665 A.2d 1247
  • 445 Pa. Super. 526
  • 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3019

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the PCRA “permits inquiry into whether a specific tribunal lacked jurisdiction to conduct a particular proceeding”
  • explaining that issues are not cognizable under the remedy of habeas corpus if they could have been considered and corrected in the regular course of appellate review
  • indicating challenge to probation revocation by means of PCRA petition is available for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, lack of jurisdiction, or illegal sentence
  • explaining issues are not cognizable under remedy of habeas corpus if they could have been considered and corrected in regular course of appellate review
  • explaining issues are not cognizable under remedy of habeas corpus if they could have been considered and corrected in regular course of appellate review
  • rejecting argument that - 15 - J-S29037-21 “subject matter jurisdiction or jurisdiction over the person of a defendant who has been convicted of a crime can be voided because of delay in the application of a procedural rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamilia, Popovich, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.