Commonwealth v. McNeely

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Relevance is comprised of two fundamental components: materiality and probative value.... ‘If the evidence is offered to help prove a proposition which is not a matter in issue, the evidence is immaterial.’ ”
• claiming even indirect testimony on credibility is inadmissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Zook
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-17· cited 102×
• Hobgood v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2006-03-23· cited 76×
• Goodson v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1990-07-11· cited 74×
• McCafferty v. Solem
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-12-13· cited 63×
• Gaudio v. Ford Motor Co.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-06-01· cited 55×
• Commonwealth v. Emge
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-12-08· cited 39×
• Commonwealth v. Purcell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-02-21· cited 34×
• KEARNS BY KEARNS v. DeHaas
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-08-24· cited 26×
• Commonwealth v. Garcia
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-03-28· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Zamarripa
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-25· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Evans
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-02-19· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Probst
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-09-18· cited 5×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kelly
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-07-24· cited 515×
• Commonwealth v. Baldwin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-06· cited 59×
• State v. Conlogue
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-04-03· cited 36×
• Commonwealth v. Gallagher
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-05-12· cited 27×
• Commonwealth v. Rodgers
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-05-28· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Little
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-07-09· cited 12×