Massachusetts Appeals Court· 12/23/2002
Commonwealth v. McIntosh
Citations
- 56 Mass. App. Ct. 827
- 780 N.E.2d 469
- 2002 Mass. App. LEXIS 1639
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The Commonwealth proceeded on the ‘reckless’ not the ‘intentional’ theory under the statute criminalizing assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon; both theories are set out in instruction 5.401 of the Model Jury Instructions for Use in the District Courts (1997)”
- windowpane qualified as dangerous weapon
- windowpane qualified as dangerous weapon
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaplan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. TevlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-01-30· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. BurnoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-01-28· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. MeltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-03-13· cited 54×
- Commonwealth v. WelchMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1983-06-29· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. SextonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-06-05· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. SextonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-11-20· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.