Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. McGrath

Citations

  • 60 Mass. App. Ct. 685
  • 805 N.E.2d 508
  • 2004 Mass. App. LEXIS 311

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding evidence sufficient when the defendant inexplicably struck a pedestrian on the side of the road, and it was not improper for prosecutor to argue in closing that the jury could infer that the defendant was using his cell phone at the time of the accident
  • holding evidence sufficient when the defendant inexplicably struck a pedestrian on the side of the road, and it was not improper for prosecutor to argue in closing that the jury could infer that the defendant was using his cell phone at the time of the accident
  • holding evidence sufficient when the defendant inexplicably struck a pedestrian on the side of the road, and it was not improper for prosecutor to argue in closing that the jury could infer that the defendant was using his cell phone at the time of the accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mason

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.