Commonwealth v. McCurdy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that sufficiency of evidence claim cannot be waived under Rule 302(a) because Pa.R.Crim.P. 606(A)(7) expressly provides that sufficiency challenge may be raised for first time on appeal
• finding evidence sufficient to support conviction for 19 corrupt organizations under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 91 l(b)(3)
• explaining Pa.R.Crim.P. 606(A)(7) expressly allows challenge to sufficiency of evidence made on appeal
• “Pa. R. Crim. P. 606(A)(7) expressly provides that a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence can be raised for the first time on appeal.”
• defendant did not waive sufficiency claim because he failed to raise it in the trial court
• Pa. Super. 2019 (citations omitted). In support of his sufficiency challenge Evans alleges several shortcomings in the Commonwealth’s evidence, including 1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. DeLuca
  Delaware County Court of Common Pleas· 2008-11-13· cited 2×
• Com. v. Cravener, S.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-08-08· cited 1×
• State of Iowa v. Randy Allen Crawford
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2022-03-18
• Com. v. Corbett, J.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-05-24

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Commonwealth v. Widmer
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-20· cited 1,854×
• Commonwealth v. Ratsamy
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-11-20· cited 275×
• Commonwealth v. Lemon
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-07-17· cited 142×
• Commonwealth v. Laboy
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-11-26· cited 134×
• Commonwealth v. Causey
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-18· cited 94×
• Commonwealth v. Dellisanti
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-06-21· cited 37×