Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. McCracken

Citations

  • 540 A.2d 537
  • 373 Pa. Super. 90
  • 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding after-discovered evidence to be cumulative of the defendant’s defense theory where extensive evidence on this theory had been presented at trial
  • a statement against penal interest must inculpate declarant and must be relevant to defendant’s case to be admissible
  • a statement against penal interest must inculpate declarant and must be relevant to defendant's case to be admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McEwen, Olszewski, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.