Commonwealth v. McCormack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• excluding portions of an expert report where the expert “reaches the specific conclusion that any Defendant acted in compliance with and/or in violation of legal duties”
• finding the expert “unquestionably invades the Court’s province by rendering a legal opinion concerning whether various agents of Refco, SPhinX, and PlusFunds complied with their obligations under federal securities law”
• “an expert cannot be presented to the jury solely for the purpose of constructing a factual narrative based on record evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).