Commonwealth v. McColl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prosecutor’s improper comments were “facetious response” to “similar references . . . made ... by the defense counsel is his argument”
• prosecutor allowed to argue “that the defendant was dissembling in his claim of insanity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).