Commonwealth v. McCloskey
Citations
- 273 Pa. 456
- 117 A. 192
- 1922 Pa. LEXIS 598
Syllabus
<p>Criminal law — Murder—Jury—Opinion of juror — Prejudging case — Waiver—No challenge for cause — Discretion of court — New trial.</p> <p>1. Where the opinion of a juror as to the guilt of a prisoner indicted for murder, is formed prior to the trial, on common rumor and newspaper stories, but he states at the trial that he can fairly try.the case on the evidence, free from any such opinion, he should not be rejected as a juror.</p> <p>2. If the defendant knows at the trial that a juror has previously expressed an opinion as to his guilt, and questions him on the subject, and the juror denies having expressed such an opinion, and declares that he has no fixed view of the guilt of defendant, and no challenge for cause is interposed, the defendant, after conviction cannot assert the alleged conduct of the juror as a reason for a new trial.</p> <p>3. In passing upon such a question, much must be left to the discretion of the court below, and nothing short of palpable error will justify a reversal.</p> <p>Criminal law — Murder—Accomplice—Evidence — Testimony of accomplice — Charge.</p> <p>4. On the trial of an indictment for murder where the testimony of an accomplice has been admitted, the court should point out in a general way, not only such testimony, but wherein it is claimed to be contradicted and corroborated, and the jury should be told that they must closely scrutinize such testimony and accept it with caution.</p> <p>5. It is not the law that the jury should be advised not to accept such testimony until corroboration is apparent.</p> <p>Criminal law — Murder—Charge—Evidence—Discretion of court.</p> <p>6. While it is the duty of a trial judge, in a capital case, to fully instruct the jury as to the law applicable to the facts without any special Tequest on part of defendant that this be done, yet he is not required to recite all of the testimony in detail; the extent to which he should go is largely a matter of discretion.</p> <p>Criminal law — Murder—Degree —
Judges: Feazer, Sadler, Schaefer, Simpson, Walling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. McGrewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-11-17· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. CornitcherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-05-25· cited 35×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Czako v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-11-12· cited 19×
- United States ex rel. De Vita v. McCorkleD. New Jersey· 1955-07-14· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. CaliendoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1924-02-04· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. GabelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-03-24· cited 1×
- Plotts' EstatePhiladelphia County Orphans' Court· 1938-04-29
- Commonwealth v. ConyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-03-20
- Commonwealth v. CohenWestmoreland County Court of Oyer and Terminer· 1937-11-19
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1844-07-15· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. RussoguloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1919-01-04· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. CraigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1902-01-21· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1913-11-07· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. SushinskieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1913-11-07· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1917-03-19· cited 27×
- Cox v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1889-03-25· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. FerkoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1920-12-31· cited 18×
- Staup v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1874-01-05· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. FrucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1906-06-27· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1902-03-24· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.