Commonwealth v. McCalman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining the count of terroristic threats was established by the defendant’s actions in holding a gun to three people’s heads, even though the use of offensive language did not rise to the level of a terroristic threat
• defendant’s use offensive language in conjunction with pointing a gun sufficient to support terroristic threats charge
• intent to cause serious bodily injury found where appellant fired bullets in direction of victims and narrowly missed them
• defendant’s convictions of aggravated assault under § 2702(a)(1) upheld when he shot in direction of the victims, even though no bullets struck them
• “It can be inferred that [McCalman] intended to cause serious bodily injury to [the victim] because the bullet he fired into the car missed her by only three inches.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).