Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 3/17/1976
Commonwealth v. May
Citations
- 353 A.2d 815
- 466 Pa. 524
- 1976 Pa. LEXIS 524
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court’s consideration of untimely claim raised at post-verdict motions stage did not preserve issue for appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. WatersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-03-23· cited 91×
- Commonwealth v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-06-30· cited 74×
- Commonwealth v. PughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-01-26· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-02-28· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-12-29· cited 14×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-01-27· cited 461×
- Commonwealth v. FutchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-04-20· cited 397×
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-03· cited 103×
- Commonwealth v. SegersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-01-27· cited 90×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-10-16· cited 72×
- Commonwealth v. CulmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-03· cited 52×
- Commonwealth v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-05-13· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. SpriggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-03· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.