Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/13/1984
Commonwealth v. Maxwell
Citations
- 329 Pa. Super. 409
- 478 A.2d 854
- 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5407
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that potentially prejudicial testimony by a detective did not warrant a mistrial because it “could have been cured by an appropriate explanation or cautionary -5- J-S63037-15 instruction.”
- defendant must show prejudice by delay between time of incident and arrest to support claim of due process violation
- defendant must show prejudice by delay between time of incident and arrest to support claim of due process violation
- defendant must show prejudice by delay between time of incident and arrest to support claim of due process violation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beck, Hoffman, Spaeth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-06-28· cited 242×
- Commonwealth v. WableSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-05-23· cited 202×
- Commonwealth v. DanielsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-27· cited 97×
- Commonwealth v. TrowerySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-11-16· cited 89×
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-12-18· cited 86×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-01-28· cited 78×
- Commonwealth v. NicholsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-05-01· cited 60×
- Commonwealth v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-03-22· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. PovishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-06-02· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-03-16· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-21· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. WhitmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-12-02· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-03· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. MarkleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-22· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. DurantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-26· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. FarrellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-04-12· cited 14×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Daniel Bolish v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaThird Circuit· 1969-04-24· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.