Commonwealth v. Matthews

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to testimony that a defendant spoke to his parole officer because the prejudice outweighed the relevance of the Commonwealth's rebuttal evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Soto
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-12-28· cited 60×
• Commonwealth v. Santiago
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-03-10· cited 33×
• Com. v. Wade, A.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-01-13· cited 8×
• State of West Virginia v. Gary Richard Baker
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2013-02-21· cited 7×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Crews
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-04-21· cited 125×
• Commonwealth v. Minerd
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-06-20· cited 94×
• Commonwealth v. Hawk
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-02-26· cited 55×
• Commonwealth v. Saxton
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-15· cited 43×
• Commonwealth v. Powers
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-05-16· cited 14×