Skip to main content
· 9/16/2003

Commonwealth v. Matin

Citations

  • 832 A.2d 1141
  • 2003 Pa. Super. 342
  • 2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that “[a] petitioner is ineligible for relief under the PCRA once the sentence for the challenged conviction is completed”
  • stressing that “[a] petitioner is ineligible for relief under the PCRA once the sentence for the challenged conviction is completed”
  • finding appellant not entitled to relief where term of imprisonment for firearms violation expired, even though appellant remained imprisoned for other crimes at the same docket number
  • affirming dismissal of PCRA petition because petitioner completed serving the sentence on the crime for which he sought 2 In relevant part, Section 9543 of the PCRA declares: (a
  • “A petitioner is ineligible for relief under the PCRA once the sentence for the challenged conviction is completed.”
  • “A petitioner is ineligible for relief under the PCRA once the sentence for the challenged conviction is completed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lally-Green, Bowes, Olszewski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.