Commonwealth v. Martinez, E.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the party asserting federal jurisdiction when it is challenged has the burden of establishing it”
• holding that plaintiffs do not have standing by virtue of their status as taxpayers to challenge the conferral of tax credits on third parties
• holding that it is pure speculation how elected state officials will pass along a tax surplus
• holding that plaintiffs do not have standing by virtue of their status as taxpayers to challenge the conferral of tax credits on third parties
• holding that state taxpayers' allegations that state tax credit depleted state treasury and imposed disproportionate burdens on them were insufficiently concrete and particularized to confer standing
• holding that “our standing cases confirm that a plaintiff must demonstrate standing for each claim he seeks to press”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).