Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Marshall

Citations

  • 456 Pa. 313
  • 318 A.2d 724
  • 1974 Pa. LEXIS 530

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that it would be contradictory to argue that a defendant may be incompetent, and yet knowingly and intelligently waive his right to have the court determine his capacity to stand trial
  • stating that it would be contradictory to argue that a defendant may be incompetent, and yet knowingly and intelligently waive his right to have the court determine his capacity to stand trial
  • finding no waiver where counsel failed to raise appellant’s mental competency prior to or during trial
  • remand to the trial court to hold a retrospective hearing to determine whether defendant was competent to stand trial
  • remand to the trial court to hold a retrospective hearing to determine whether defendant was competent to stand trial
  • Supreme Court remanded for evidentiary hearing where second and third psychiatric examinations, eight months before and one month after second trial, raised serious doubts about appellant’s competency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manderino, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Mandarino, Jones, Nix

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.