Commonwealth v. Marrero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “As a general rule the defendant does not have the option to act in violation of a court order and then, in a subsequent criminal proceeding, assert as a defense that the order should not have been issued”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Quinn v. Gjoni
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2016-05-19· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Deitner
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-05-30

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. United Mine Workers of America
  Supreme Court· 1947-03-06· cited 2,872×
• Walker v. City of Birmingham
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 621×
• Commonwealth v. Daye
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1984-09-24· cited 161×
• Commonwealth v. West
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1942-11-30· cited 78×
• Commonwealth v. Jackson
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-11-13· cited 67×
• Unnamed case
  First Circuit· 1986-12-31· cited 48×
• Commonwealth v. Martin
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1994-03-02· cited 41×
• Commonwealth v. Silva
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-05-10· cited 40×
• Harris v. Sannella
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-07-07· cited 38×
• Commonwealth v. Dodge
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-02-10· cited 28×
• City of Fitchburg v. 707 Main Corp.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-02-24· cited 14×
• Mohamad v. Kavlakian
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2007-06-04· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Reddy
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2014-03-19· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Rauseo
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-01-10· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Martin
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-02-26· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Davis
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-06-27· cited 3×