Commonwealth v. Mangham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “not enough to show that [plaintiff] has suffered by the diversion of travel ... if the access to the system of public streets remains substantially unimpaired”
• “the advantage which the landowner had [of having] the luck to enjoy . . . being where the crowd was” is not compensable injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).