Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Mahar

Citations

  • 430 Mass. 643
  • 722 N.E.2d 461
  • 2000 Mass. LEXIS 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting proposed Mass. G. Evid. § 806 to permit impeachment by prior inconsistent statement
  • adopting rule of evidence similar to § 8-8 because “[t]here is no reason to put a proponent of an absent witness in a better position than a proponent of a live witness”
  • home invasion statute “clearly designed to protect occupants of a dwelling from . . . entry by an armed person who, once inside, assaults and traumatizes the occupants” [emphasis added]
  • statements not hearsay; admissible because they are not offered for truth, but to impeach witness
  • issue preserved for appeal when trial counsel failed to cite rule, but “argument tracked the substance of the rule”
  • error, albeit harmless, to exclude prior inconsistent statement that directly contradicted nontestifying victim’s hearsay statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greaney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.