Commonwealth v. Maddox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence that witness may have sexually abused one child properly excluded because it gave no more than specula tive support to inference that witness may have killed the victim and because it posed substantial risk of misleading the jury
• “[t]rial courts retain broad discretion to regulate cross-examination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).