Commonwealth v. MacK

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing no relief where the appellant alleged sufficiency but argued weight; weight issue was reserved for fact-finder below
• providing no relief where the appellant alleged sufficiency but argued a weight claim; the weight issue was reserved for the fact-finder below
• Pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 607, a challenge to the weight of the evidence must be raised with the trial court or it is waived.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Sherwood
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-11-06· cited 442×
• Commonwealth v. Lopez
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-08-08· cited 261×
• Commonwealth v. Palo
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-07-01· cited 93×
• Commonwealth v. Ratushny
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-04-06· cited 88×
• Commonwealth v. Schoff
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-11-02· cited 81×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. DiStefano
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-08-16· cited 268×
• Commonwealth v. Burns
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-12-20· cited 148×
• Commonwealth v. Causey
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-18· cited 94×
• Commonwealth v. Davis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-11-23· cited 57×
• Commonwealth v. Goodwine
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-04-08· cited 40×
• Commonwealth v. Washington
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-05-28· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Szekeresh
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-09-23· cited 14×