Skip to main content
· 7/22/1975

Commonwealth v. MacDonald (No. 1)

Citations

  • 333 N.E.2d 189
  • 368 Mass. 395
  • 1975 Mass. LEXIS 1009

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • new trial denied despite comments that defense testimony was perjured and despite derogatory comments on the characters of the defendant and the defense witnesses
  • new trial denied despite comments that defense testimony was perjured and despite derogatory comments on the characters of the defendant and the defense witnesses
  • defendant failed to object to his absence from judge’s private interview of two jurors, and hence not permitted to raise issue on appeal
  • court found that because the defendant failed to object to his absence from private interviews with the jurors, he was precluded from raising the issue on appeal
  • jurors asked to tell “bums and hoodlums” of South Boston that crime will not be tolerated found to be improper but cured by instruction from trial judge
  • denial of motion for names and addresses of witnesses not abuse of discretion and did not violate constitutional rights where defendant did not show prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro, Reardon, Quirico, Kaplan, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.