Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Lynch

Citations

  • 57 A.3d 120
  • 2012 Pa. Super. 230
  • 2012 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2948

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that notice was sufficient where prior bad act evidence was included in affidavit of probable cause and testimony at a prior hearing
  • holding that no unfair surprise was present, and the notice requirement thus was satisfied, when the other acts at issue were included in the affidavit of probable cause
  • noting that there is no requirement that the “notice” must be formally given or be in writing in order for the evidence to be admissible
  • rejecting claim of lack of notice of prior bad acts where defendant failed to demonstrate unfair surprise
  • finding 120 day -7- J-S67032-16 mechanical run date was triggered by the defendant’s filing of a notice of appeal for a trial de novo from the sentence entered in the Municipal Court
  • discovery provided to the defense disclosing Rule 404(b) evidence is sufficient notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, McEwen, Musmanno

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.