Skip to main content
· 8/21/2000

Commonwealth v. Lusch

Citations

  • 759 A.2d 6
  • 2000 Pa. Super. 241
  • 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where habeas corpus petition is properly treated as PCRA petition and filed more than one year after judgment became final, petitioner must plead and prove exception to statutory time-bar to establish timeliness
  • a habeas corpus petition raising a claim cognizable under the PCRA must comply with the PCRA timeliness requirements
  • accusations of trial counsel ineffectiveness are cognizable under the PCRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Melvin, Olszewski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.