Commonwealth v. Lunde

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant “responded cogently” to booking questions and thereafter, having received Miranda warnings, remained silent except to ask for an attorney
• “The law does not give the opinions of experts the benefit of conclusiveness, even if there are no contrary opinions introduced at trial”
• Commonwealth may carry its burden even when conceding defendant suffered from mental disease or defect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).