Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 11/24/1992
Commonwealth v. Luddy
Citations
- 532 Pa. 623
- 617 A.2d 315
- 1992 Pa. LEXIS 536
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- following Dugger and recognizing that the Commonwealth has the right to appellate review of an adverse suppression ruling which terminates or substantially handicaps the prosecution
- following Dugger and recognizing that the Commonwealth has the right to appellate review of an adverse suppression ruling which terminates or substantially handicaps the prosecution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cappy, Files, Flaherty, Larsen, McDermott, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-04-16· cited 463×
- Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-09· cited 417×
- Commonwealth v. BillaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-06· cited 186×
- Commonwealth v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-03-19· cited 69×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-10-08· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-06-23· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-28· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. MuellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-04· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.