Commonwealth v. Luce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where there is no objection to the use of a prior inconsistent statement, and no request for a limiting instruction, the statements may be considered as substantive evidence
• power under G. L. c. 278, § 33E, exercised with restraint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).